DOGE will be allowed to access Social Security data for now, Supreme Court rules

https://static.independent.co.uk/2025/03/20/20/36/Social-Security-Administration-Headquarters-8mda6bqn.jpeg?width=1200&auto=webp&trim=1%2C0%2C1%2C0

The Department of Government Efficiency will be permitted to access sensitive Social Security data while litigation over the matter continues, the U.S. Supreme Court said in an order on Friday.

Lifting an injunction that a lower court judge placed to protect the privacy of Americans, the conservative wing of the court agreed the DOGE staffers assigned to the Social Security Administration need to access the information to perform their jobs.

“We conclude that, under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work,” the justices wrote in an unsigned order.

DOGE, set up by Elon Musk before he departed from the government, intended to find “waste, fraud, and abuse” in the federal government. Musk had previously characterized Social Security as a “Ponzi scheme.”

Liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented from the majority. Justice Elena Kagan said she would have denied the emergency application.

Supreme Court allowed the Department of Government Efficiency team assigned to the Social Security Administration to access sensitive data
Supreme Court allowed the Department of Government Efficiency team assigned to the Social Security Administration to access sensitive data (Getty Images)

Writing for the dissenting justices, Jackson questioned the court’s reasoning for intervening in the emergency request – an increasingly hot-button issue at the court.

“I would proceed without fear or favor to require DOGE and the Government to do what all other litigants must do to secure a stay from this Court: comply with lower court orders constraining their behavior unless and until they establish that irreparable harm will result such that equity requires a different course,” Jackson wrote.

“The Court opts instead to relieve the Government of the standard obligations, jettisoning careful judicial decision making and creating grave privacy risks for millions of Americans in the process,” Jackson added.

This is a breaking news story, more follows…